A Family's Quest for Justice: The Ikhbal Accident Incident

Category: Criminal Law
Blog Post Image
「 ✦ Content ✦ 」

FACTS OF THE CASE

  • The appellants of the case are the widow, a minor child and parents of the deceased Ikhbal who died in a road accident on 10.06.2013. 

  • The appellants claim that Ikhbal died in an attempt to overtake a stopped bus near Mrala junction, by being hit by respondent No.2’s car which was coming from the opposite direction, causing greater injuries to Ikhbal resulting in his death. 

  • Respondents nos. 1 to 3 are the car’s owner, driver, and insurer respectively. Respondents nos. 2 and 3 contested the claim petition while respondent no. 1 remained ex-parte.

  • While the Respondents denied the involvement of the car in the accident claiming that the deceased died because he attempted to overtake the bus. 

  • The respondent further states that the deceased died by being hit by the bus and was taken to the hospital by Respondent No.2. 


ISSUES OF THE CASE 

       Key issues of this case are:

  • Whether the car was involved in the accident?

  • Whether the car driver was negligent?

  • Whether the actions of the deceased resulted in the accident?

  • Whether the witnesses are credible? 


LEGAL PROVISIONS 

  • Article 136 

This article provides the Supreme Court with the power to review a decision of lower courts if it thinks the case requires special attention. 


  • Res Ipsa Loquitur 

Sometimes proving negligence becomes very difficult at times like when proving of accident alone is enough and the presumption arises as to what created the accident. 


  • Mahazar 

In this case, it is a document where the details of the search or any other important event during a police investigation are been recorded. 


CONTENTIONS BY THE APPELLANT 

By examining 6 witnesses the Appellant was represented by a learned senior counsel Mr. Thomas P. Joseph, who argues that there is clear evidence of the involvement of the car in the accident, and the MACT & the High Court has failed to read the evidence effectively. He continues his argument by stating that the evidences are supposed to read in context with the legal principle Res Ipsa Loquitur which the courts below have failed. Praying for considering the appeal to award the sum assessed by the MACT. 


CONTENTIONS BY THE RESPONDENT

By examining 2 witnesses before the MACT, the respondent represented by a learned senior counsel Mr. Atul Nanda, counter-attacked the appellants by arguing that the lower court closely examined the evidence and gave a fair judgement stating that the respondent was not involved in the car accident.  Referring to the statement of witnesses, learned senior counsel argued that none of the witnesses had seen the car hitting the motorcycle driven by the deceased. Lastly, he argues that the lower courts have closely examined the facts and evidence and then came up with a fair ruling giving no power to the Supreme Court to interfere under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution.

JUDGEMENT 

Setting aside the ruling of the lower courts, the Supreme Court assures the involvement of the car in the accident which was insured with respondent no.3. SC allows the claim petition to the appellant at Rs. 46,31,496 with interest @9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of realization of the payment. If the respondents failed to make payment within 3 months the award amount shall carry interest @12% per annum.  With all the stated terms the appeal was allowed. 


ANALYSIS

Involving strong arguments and numerous eye-witnesses this case reflects how a road accident affects the victim as well as their family and how the judiciary system of India promotes fair judgement. Setting aside the decision of the lower courts the Supreme Court once again proves its guardian nature to the Nation through this case. 


CONCLUSION 

Revolving around a road accident this case emphasizes the need for a close examination of the evidence to award the victim with fair judgement and compensation.


OLQ is a Pan-India basis law firm connecting legal expertise nationwide.

WRITTEN BY: D.V. DEEKSHA

GUIDED BY: ADVOCATE ANIK


Rounded Image

Submit Comment